Re: sendmail.cf.rpmnew, but no sendmail.mc.rpmnew? [][] [][] [] [] [] Re: sendmail.cf.rpmnew, but no sendmail.mc.rpmnew?

• From: Philip Prindeville • To: filter stevenstromer com, RPM Package Manager • Cc: • Subject: Re: sendmail.cf.rpmnew, but no sendmail.mc.rpmnew? • Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:40:37 -0600 Steven Stromer wrote: >>>I'm not sure there's an issue here. >>>>The.mc file gets processed by m4 and pulls in a bunch of m4 'source' >>files that then cause a new generated.cf file to be created.

>>>>Since people rarely modify the.m4 files, these get transparently >>updated with no generated.rpmnew files. >>>>Agreed, so far. >I should have added that the.m4 files do have a not-insignificant amount of churn from one release to the next, however. >>>The resultant.cf file, however, may clash with edits you've made.

Warning submit mc is modified please install package sendmail cf to update your configuration. SAVING Guessing RECORDED VIDEO Therein xms is complete, a white comes is displayed. Shoulders the download results. DOWNLOAD TO PC 01-01-05 00 36 21 Printable AREA Herbal Seg. Order for your situation. I seem to have a send mail problem.the server is RHes3 i edited the etc/mail/mail.mc then did [root@Mixer mail]# make -C /etc/mail make: Entering directory `/etc/mail' WARNING: 'sendmail.mc' is modified. Please install package sendmail-cf to update your configuration. WARNING: 'submit.mc' is modified.

>>>>Unless you've not made edits, in which case, 'yes', the original.cf >>file should have been replaced with the new. Corel Draw X5 Free Download Full Version With Crack Kickass. cf file. Is this not >>happening? >>>>My.cf file was not replaced by the new.cf file; thus, the birth of >this thread. It would seem to me the 'clash' you describe is not only >inevitable, but desirable, due to the fact that my.cf file, by >definition, contains the mail settings I entered via my.mc file. >Ah, so you did edit your.mc file. I missed that originally. >>>If your.mc file hadn't been modified and neither had your.cf file, >>then running 'make sendmail.cf' will cause your sendmail.cf to be >>regenerated.

And agree with your sendmail.mc file, which should always >>be the case anyway. >>>>I fully understand and agree that the two files should 'agree', but I >don't see how this clarifies or explains the fact that I see minor, but >certainly differing, lines in the.rpmnew file that do not appear in the >.cf file that is presently generated when I regenerate the file. >>Maybe the real question here should be where the differences I see >really stem from. It just seems logical to me that if a.cf file is >being included with a package update, it must be that it contains >elements that no other files can provide to it during a regeneration. >The.m4 files might be identical, but the.m4 files in /usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/ that get included by sendmail.mc and submit.mc might changed significantly, causing the resultant.cf files to also be different.

Example:% head /etc/mail/sendmail.mc. That, in turn, sets up definitions for other files that get pulled in (like OSTYPE(), etc). >However, maybe this is where I am off base!

Does the.cf file get >completely written from scratch by other files during its regeneration, >or is it simply edited during this process? If it is entirely dependent >on outside 'sources' for the entirely of its content, with every line >being entirely system-specific, then why include it with a package >update at all, instead of just letting the end user generate his or her >own.cf file? >It is completely clobbered. From my /etc/mail/Makefile:%.cf:%.mc @if test -f /usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4; then umask 022; [ -e $@ ] && mv -f $@ $ bak; m4 $ $@; else echo -e 'WARNING: '$ As I write, I am beginning to believe that my confusion steps from this >single factor! Why include a.cf file in the package update, at all, if >the.cf file is supposed to reflect the system it is located on?

>Because not everyone wants to have the contents of /usr/share/sendmail-cf/ on their system. Still other people are foolish enough to edit their sendmail.cf by hand. >Suddenly, I begin to feel the clouds part, I contemplate the simplicity >of 'rm /etc/mail/sendmail.cf.rpmnew', and a smile forms on my face. >>Can anyone confirm that I am finally seeing the light? >Amen and hallelujah.

-Philip • References: • • From: Steven Stromer • • From: Jeff Johnson • • From: Steven Stromer • • From: Philip Prindeville • • From: Steven Stromer [][] [][] [] [] [].

RPM resource sendmail-cf The search service can find package by either name ( apache), provides( webserver), absolute file names ( /usr/bin/apache), binaries ( gprof) or shared libraries ( libXm.so.2) in standard path. It does not support multiple arguments yet. The System and Arch are optional added filters, for example System could be 'redhat', 'redhat-7.2', 'mandrake' or 'gnome', Arch could be 'i386' or 'src', etc.

Download Thuy Nga 113 Bluray. Depending on your system. System Arch RPM resource sendmail-cf This package includes the configuration files which you'd need to generate the sendmail.cf file distributed with the sendmail package. You'll need the sendmail-cf package if you ever need to reconfigure and rebuild your sendmail.cf file. For example, the default sendmail.cf file is not configured for UUCP.

If someday you needed to send and receive mail over UUCP, you'd need to install the sendmail-cf package to help you reconfigure Sendmail. Install the sendmail-cf package if you need to reconfigure your sendmail.cf file.